Automotive physics and efficiency

Why does electric vehicle consumption spike when towing a caravan or trailer?

Thermodynamic and aerodynamic analysis: why a diesel only increases consumption by ~35% while an EV can easily double it (+100%).

Simulación aerodinámica de remolque en vehículo eléctrico

Dynamic towing and consumption simulator

Compare in real time the impact of towing different types of trailers or towball accessories on an EV versus diesel or petrol engines.

Vehicle only
Base baseline with no exterior load
Towball bike rack
2-3 bicycles (+20% Cd·A, +45 kg)
Light cargo trailer / bikes
Low unbraked cargo (<750 kg, +35% Cd·A)
Folding caravan / Teardrop
Low aerodynamic profile (750 kg, +75% Cd·A)
Standard medium caravan
Rigid body height 2.4m (1,200 kg, +180% Cd·A)
Large tandem caravan / Horsebox
High volume height 2.6m (1,650 kg, +250% Cd·A)
90 km/h
70 km/h 90 km/h (legal España) 120 km/h
Required aerodynamic power scales cubically with velocity
Reference energy costs
Estimated consumption
33.8 kWh/100km
Vehicle only: 17.2 kWh/100km
Consumption increase
+96.5%
Casi el doble de energía
Real range
179 km
Range difference: -172 km (-49%)
Cost per 100 km
8.45 € / 100 km
Vehicle only: 4.30 € / 100 km
Where does the demanded energy go?
Aerodynamic drag (Cd·A) 74%
Rolling resistance 16%
Gradient and inertia 4%
Powertrain losses (thermal/inverter) 6%
Vehicle only vs With trailer
Direct comparison: EV vs Diesel vs Petrol at identical speed
Concept Electric (Atto 3) Diesel 2.0 TDI Petrol 1.5 TSI
Consumption vehicle only 17.2 kWh/100km 5.8 L/100km 6.9 L/100km
Consumption with trailer 33.8 kWh/100km 9.4 L/100km 11.8 L/100km
Energy penalty (%) +96.5% +62.0% +71.0%
Range vehicle only 351 km 948 km 724 km
Range with trailer 179 km 585 km 423 km
Range loss (%) -49.0% -38.2% -41.5%
Cost per 100 km 8.45 € 14.10 € 17.70 €
Equivalent useful energy on board ~54 kWh útiles (60.5 kWh bat) ~190 kWh útiles (550 kWh brutos) ~145 kWh útiles (445 kWh brutos)
Pillar 1: Thermodynamics

The engine efficiency paradox (BSFC map vs 90% EV efficiency)

The electric motor of a BEV has an outstanding baseline efficiency of 88% to 94% under both light and heavy loads. Because it produces almost no residual heat losses, every extra watt of drag is directly drawn from the battery.

In contrast, an internal combustion engine (ICE) is extremely inefficient at light loads (only 20-25% in petrol and 30-35% in diesel), wasting 70-80% of fuel energy as heat. When towing, engine load increases and moves into its optimal BSFC efficiency island, jumping to 35-42%.

Put simply: the combustion engine 'cushions' extra effort by becoming thermodynamically more efficient under heavy load, whereas the electric motor cannot mask the extra work because it was already near-optimal.

Pillar 2: Energy density

Tank capacity: 60 kWh vs 550 chemical kWh

A 55-liter diesel tank holds approximately 550 kWh of gross chemical energy (~190 useful kWh after heat losses). In comparison, an Atto 3 battery stores 60.5 kWh gross (the chemical equivalent of barely 6 liters of fuel).

When towing a full-size caravan and required energy per kilometer doubles (from 18 to 36 kWh/100km in the EV, or 6.0 to 9.5 L/100km in diesel):

In the electric car, depleting 60.5 kWh at 36 kWh/100km cuts range from 340 km down to 165 km (-52%). In diesel, rising from 6.0 to 9.5 L/100km reduces range from 915 km to 575 km, which remains a generous cruising range that also refuels in 3 minutes anywhere.

Pillar 3: Aerodynamics

The aerodynamic wall and cubic power law (P ∝ v³)

Aerodynamic drag force directly depends on vehicle shape and frontal area: Fd = 0.5 · ρ · v² · (Cd · A). Modern EVs are sculpted for extremely low drag (Atto 3 has a Cd of 0.29 with a Cd·A of ~0.75 m²).

A traditional caravan is virtually a vertical wall (Cd of 0.70 to 0.85 and area of 4.8 m²). When attached, laminar airflow collapses at the rear and total Cd·A easily triples.

Since the power required to overcome drag scales with the cube of speed (doubling speed requires 8 times more power), raising cruising speed from 80 km/h to 100 km/h with a caravan adds another ~45% in aerodynamic consumption.

Pillar 4: Energy recovery

Mechanical overrun brakes and loss of regeneration

During regular EV driving, regenerative braking captures 70% to 85% of kinetic energy during deceleration and downhill slopes.

However, trailers and caravans over 750 kg feature legally required mechanical overrun brakes. When the EV slows down or regenerates, the trailer tongue compresses and triggers mechanical drum brakes on the trailer.

All that kinetic energy and added mass from the caravan is dissipated as heat in its drum brakes, preventing the EV electric motor from recovering it into the battery pack.

Practical guide for towing with an electric vehicle

Driving strategies, en-route charging logistics, and weight regulations.
1. The 85-90 km/h golden rule

Towing speed limits across most of Europe are set at 80-90 km/h. Keeping your cruise control at 85-90 km/h rather than pushing to 100 km/h can preserve up to 25% of your battery pack range.

2. Charging logistics: Drive-Through vs standard bays

Most DC fast chargers are standard pull-in or reverse bays. Arriving with a caravan will block lanes or force unhitching. Plan stops at 'Drive-Through' stations (like select Ionity, Zunder or Tesla V4 hubs) or uncouple in an adjacent parking bay before plugging in.

3. Homologation and tow ratings (BYD Atto 3)

Always check your vehicle registration sheet (braked and unbraked tow capacity). The BYD Atto 3 is rated for 750 kg max towing capacity, and a max vertical towball load (S-load) of 50 to 75 kg. Never exceed these ratings to protect suspension and chassis.

4. Tyre pressures and load distribution

An under-inflated trailer tyre can increase rolling resistance by 15%. Check cold tyre pressures before departure. Place heavy loads directly over the trailer axle and ensure a positive tongue weight of 40-60 kg to avoid dangerous trailer sway.

Myths and FAQ

No. Unlike ICE cars with mechanical clutches or torque converters that suffer on hill starts, electric motors deliver full torque from zero RPM with liquid thermal cooling and direct reduction gearing. The only penalty is higher battery consumption.

Continuous load slightly increases the discharge C-rate (from 0.3C to 0.6C), but BYD Blade LFP cells are engineered to handle 2C-3C continuous rates without chemical stress. The thermal management system keeps the pack in its optimal 25-35°C window.

Yes, next-generation 'e-trailers' integrate their own battery pack (15-30 kWh) and electric axle motors that assist the tow vehicle during acceleration and regenerate down hills, keeping EV consumption almost identical to solo driving.

Charging at home before departure and doing 2 en-route fast charges (at 0.40-0.45 €/kWh), total cost is around 14-16 €/100 km (~75 €). In a diesel consuming 9.5 L/100km at 1.50 €/L, the cost is 14.25 €/100 km (~71 €). Running costs are virtually identical; the main difference lies in charging stops.